Q: 6
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within a healthcare and life science company. The
company is a
leading player in its industry, dedicated to transforming healthcare with new ideas and
advancements. The
company has multiple divisions that cover different aspects of the business.
The company's Enterprise Architecture (EA) department has been operating for several years and has
mature, well-developed architecture governance and development processes following the TOGAF
Standard. In addition to the EA program, the company has a number of management frameworks in
use.
The Architecture Board includes representatives from each division of the company.
Many of the company's rivals have begun utilizing Artificial Intelligence (Al) in their operations, and
the
indications are that this will be transformative for healthcare delivery. This is something the EA
department
has been interested in for a while, and they had recently submitted an architecture Change Request
which
was approved. As a result, the CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to investigate the
implementation of Al in the company.
Areas for evaluation include:
How can staff use Al daily in their current role?
How Al can enhance access to care for patients, and how to make that experience seamless?
How Al can offer new workplace platforms and tools to increase efficiency?
Some of the top managers are worried about a change in the way of working, and if it will achieve
the goals.
Many are not confident that the company's risk management processes are adequate for a company-
wide
integration of generative Al. There are also questions from staff about whether enough specific
guidelines
and polices have been put in place for responsible use of Al.
The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture program. The CIO
has
actively encouraged architecting with agility within the EA department as her preferred approach for
projects.
The CIO wants to know how to address these concerns and reduce risks.
Refer to the scenario
You have been tasked with starting the architecture development. How do you begin?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?
Options
Discussion
A . Had something like this in a mock and TOGAF always stresses starting with stakeholder analysis in Phase A, especially when there are concerns about risk and change. Building that Stakeholder Map and documenting concerns up front is key before moving to deeper models or plans. Pretty sure it’s A, but open to another view if someone sees it different.
Was thinking about this too. Since TOGAF kicks off with stakeholder analysis in Phase A, starting there seems right, especially when everyone has concerns about AI risks. Anyone see a good argument for B or C over A?
Why not start with stakeholder analysis like A says? Saw similar in exam reports, matches TOGAF guidance.
Be respectful. No spam.