Q: 4
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team at a large
government agency with multiple divisions. The agency has a well-established EA practice and
follows the TOGAF standard as its method for architecture development. The government has
mandated that the agency prepare for an "AI-first" world.
The agency wants to determine the impact and role of AI in its future services. The CIO has approved
a Request for Architecture Work to explore the use of AI in services. Some leaders are concerned
about reliance on AI, security, and employees’ need to acquire new skills.
The EA team leader seeks suggestions on managing the risks associated with a new architecture for
the AI-first project. Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?
Options
Discussion
A is correct, but watch out: if they had asked specifically about risk treatment or mitigation processes, you'd actually need references to later ADM phases (like Phase G for governance). Here it's about identifying and documenting risks early. Seen similar wording in practice sets. Agree?
C or A. I'm pretty sure A matches TOGAF steps since you log concerns early in the Vision and handle risks in the Architecture Requirements doc, but sometimes these questions trip me up. Anyone else think it's not B?
Be respectful. No spam.