I see why people get stuck between C and D. C makes most sense here since the Implementation Governance Model actually defines how governance is handled as you move to implementation, with specific processes and responsibilities. D is more about the overall direction or high-level approach, not the day-to-day oversight for governance. Pretty sure C fits best, but open to other views if anyone has a different read.
Pretty sure it’s C, but D tripped me up for a sec since strategy sounds close. Implementation Governance Model is specifically about putting the right checks and roles in place as you move into real oversight, not just planning rollout steps. Anyone else get thrown by D?
Just to clarify, is the question asking for the framework that formally connects a project to Architecture Governance (not just planning for migration)? If it's looking for that governance link, then B could be tempting, but C fits if governance structure matters most.