1. New Jersey Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 5, Section 6.4(a): This regulation governs advertising by real estate licensees and prohibits any advertisement that is "misleading or inaccurate in any material particular or is in any way a misrepresentation." This rule establishes the legal boundary that puffing (as a non-factual opinion) does not cross, whereas the incorrect options (A, C, D) present specific claims that could be deemed misleading or inaccurate if false.
2. Mann, R. A., & Roberts, B. S. (2019). Business Law and the Regulation of Business. Cengage Learning. In discussions on contract law and sales, legal textbooks used in university business and law programs consistently define puffing as a "statement of opinion" that a reasonable person would not rely upon, contrasting it with a "statement of fact" or promise that can form the basis of a misrepresentation claim. The example of a "beautiful view" is a standard illustration of puffing. (See Chapter 13: Contractual Capacity and Legality).
3. Barron, D. (2012). Real Estate Licensing Exams for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. University-level and professional licensing preparatory materials clarify this distinction. On page 68, it is explained that puffing is an exaggeration of an opinion, such as "the most beautiful landscaping," while misrepresentation involves a false statement about a material fact, such as incorrect property taxes or structural conditions.