Q: 5
An administrator wants to implement additional Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) on a data
center NGFW that already has one enabled. What benefit does the NGFW’s single-pass parallel
processing (SP3) architecture provide?
Options
Discussion
B is wrong, C. Had something like this in a mock, SP3 does mean low performance impact but not zero.
I don’t think B fits here-SP3 isn’t magic, there’s always some impact when adding new services. The key is that it only causes a minor drop, so C lines up with what Palo says about their architecture. B is a trap since it promises zero performance loss which just isn’t realistic in production. I’m pretty sure C is right but open to other takes if I missed something.
A is off, C here. SP3 just means minor hit, not zero.
B , because SP3 was supposed to eliminate performance hits entirely right? Maybe I'm missing a trap in the wording.
C that's what SP3 is all about. Extra services add just a minor hit, not zero impact like B suggests. Pretty sure.
C official docs and practice exams both call out minor performance impact with SP3. Worth skimming the guide for similar examples.
I always thought B since SP3 is designed for efficiency, so "no degradation" seemed right.
C imo. SP3 means extra inspections just cause a minor slowdown, not none at all. If you run super heavy features though, there still can be a dip so "no degradation" (B) would be wrong. Seen this tripped up in some exam reports if you miss that detail.
C, saw a similar question in lab practice, SP3 means you get only a slight performance dip.
Its C, not B. SP3 helps but you still see a bit of performance hit, just not as big as you would with serial processing. Some folks think it's zero impact but that's a common mix-up.
Be respectful. No spam.