Q: 1
You are managing a high availability (HA) cluster that hosts mission-critical applications. One of the
nodes in the cluster has failed, but the application remains available to users.
What mechanism is responsible for ensuring that the workload continues to run without
interruption?
Options
Discussion
C . Data replication (D) protects your data, but only the failover mechanism actually keeps the app running without service interruption. Some folks get tripped up by D here.
Going With C is correct. Saw a nearly identical question in a mock-the failover mechanism takes over automatically with no user interruption. Data replication (D) helps with integrity but not the instant switch. Open to counterpoints if I missed something.
Option C here. Failover is the key HA feature, not D, which is just about data integrity. Trap answer for sure.
Option C, data replication (D) sounds tempting but it's really about data not app uptime.
C imo, this matches what the official guide says for HA clusters. Practice tests cover similar scenarios.
Option D
Honestly, I think D. Data replication feels like the key for making sure everything keeps working, since it protects against node loss. Seems like a trap for C here.
C here. The question points to the automatic failover doing the heavy lifting for zero downtime, not data replication or manual intervention. Pretty sure about this but open if someone else sees it differently.
I think C, saw something similar on a practice test. Failover is what keeps things running when a node drops. Agree?
Makes sense to choose C. Failover is what keeps the app running if a node crashes, not data replication or manual admin.
Be respectful. No spam.