Does the question specify if "mlx5_X" is just an example, or are we supposed to check all InfiniBand devices? If it wants "the best" option for checking multiple interfaces at once, maybe B could be tempting, but D directly shows state and link info per interface.
Q: 11
[InfiniBand Troubleshooting]
You are troubleshooting an InfiniBand network issue and need to check the status of the InfiniBand
interfaces. Which command should you use to display the state, physical state, and link layer of
InfiniBand interfaces?
Options
Discussion
D imo, that's the only one that gives you all three details (state, physical state, link layer) in one go.
B tbh, because /proc/net/ib/device has info about the interfaces too and you can grep for states there. Not sure if that's detailed enough though. Anyone else tried B in real setups?
D
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 12
[InfiniBand Configuration]
Why is the InfiniBand LRH called a local header?
Options
Discussion
Why wouldn't it be C? The LRH is about routing within the subnet, so A sounds better than just local link access.
A tbh, LRH routes traffic just inside the local subnet.
C/A? But pretty sure it's A. The LRH in InfiniBand handles packet delivery within the local subnet, not beyond. It uses LIDs to get to nodes only inside the local fabric. If it needs to cross subnets, then it needs the global header. Someone correct me if I'm off here!
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 13
[AI Network Architecture]
You are designing a new AI data center for a research institution that requires high-performance
computing for large-scale deep learning models. The institution wants to leverage NVIDIA's reference
architectures for optimal performance.
Which NVIDIA reference architecture would be most suitable for this high-performance AI research
environment?
Options
Discussion
Yeah, D makes sense here. DGX SuperPOD is the actual reference architecture for massive AI/HPC clusters on-prem, while LaunchPad (C) is just for quick hands-on labs. Pretty sure SuperPOD is what NVIDIA recommends for these research setups. Anyone see a reason to consider B instead?
C/D? LaunchPad is more for hands-on demos, not for production-grade HPC. Pretty sure D is right since SuperPOD is the go-to blueprint for big AI datacenters, but C might trap some folks since it's also widely used. Thoughts?
Is there a budget constraint? If price is a factor, that would make B a more likely choice.
D
C/D? LaunchPad looks tempting but DGX SuperPOD fits reference architecture for HPC AI data centers. C only if they're after small-scale demos.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 14
[Spectrum-X Optimization]
How is congestion evaluated in an NVIDIA Spectrum-X system?
Options
Discussion
Probably D, since congestion checks usually look at egress queue buildup in these switches.
That would be D for sure. Spectrum-X is all about telemetry at the egress queues, so if those loads spike, you know there's congestion building up. The other options don't really reflect how network switches track real-time traffic issues. Seen similar questions come up in practice tests, but open to any other input if someone's seen different.
D
Makes sense since real congestion gets detected in the egress queue loads, that’s how Spectrum-X tracks oversubscribed ports. Pretty sure none of the others measure actual network congestion conditions.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 15
[Spectrum-X Configuration]
What is the purpose of configuring NVUE to ignore Linux files?
Options
Discussion
Option B, Lets you use both NVUE and traditional flat file configs for certain settings without them clashing. Pretty sure that's the main reason, since it avoids unwanted overwrites.
Man, the wording tripped me up on similar question, but B for dual config is what's expected here.
Its D
C or D? I'd actually go with B, since the main reason is letting you use both NVUE and manual flat-file configs together. D looks tempting but isn't really what ignore-files does. Anyone see it asked differently?
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 11 of 20 · Page 2 / 2