Why does NVIDIA always make the upgrade steps different from install? I feel like every similar exam question expects you to remember that you need to run the OFED uninstall script before touching anything else, just because upgrade needs to be clean. Does anyone ever actually use apt for DOCA upgrades?
apt-get upgrade doca or install it straight, since package managers handle upgrades pretty well in most Linux stuff. Not 100 percent sure, maybe missing a cleanup step but that's how I typically approach upgrades.Option C fits best since Cyber-AI Platform is the only UFM option that applies AI for security threat detection and predictive analytics. D looks tempting because of the network failure prediction part, but it doesn't cover security like C does. Pretty sure about this, but open to correction if anyone found otherwise.
Option C is the one for security threat detection using analytics. D sounds tempting because of "Telemetry" but it's mainly for monitoring, not AI-driven threat identification. Pretty sure C is correct here based on what Cyber-AI offers. Feel free to contest!
ibstat -d mlx5_X gives the InfiniBand state and link layer directly. D can show link status but won’t show InfiniBand-specific details, which is what you need here. Agree?ip link show dev ib0 does show interface state, which I thought would be enough for status checks. Not sure if I'm missing something about link layer output though. Maybe C is a trap option but still seems close?ip link show dev ib0 gives state info. Doesn't list InfiniBand link layer details directly, but if the cluster config sticks to Ethernet mode, could be enough. Am I missing a scenario here?ip link show dev ib0 to check state and status quickly. I think it shows if the interface is up/down and the link type, but maybe it misses some InfiniBand-specific details. Has anyone double-checked output difference?Real-time issue monitoring across all those layers definitely sounds like option A, WJH. Official docs and labs mention WJH for this use case, not ONIE or NCLU. Pretty confident here, but if someone saw a different scenario in an official practice test, let me know.
Had almost the same question in a practice test, and it was A. WJH gives you real-time monitoring for L1 to ACL drops, way more detailed than what NCLU or ONIE provides. Pretty sure A is right but open if someone found an edge case for C.
I think it's A since WJH does detailed multi-layer monitoring, but not 100% sure if there's a rare use case for C (NCLU) I'm missing. Leaning toward WJH based on its coverage of L1-L3 and ACLs. Anyone disagree?
C for this. EVPN Multi-homing lets you do active-active straight to servers but doesn't need a dedicated peer-link like MLAG does, since it uses the IP fabric for sync. Pretty sure that's what Cumulus pushes for VXLAN setups. Unless I'm missing some detail, this fits the question best. Agree?