Man, Microsoft keeps changing the naming conventions, it gets confusing. For getting new features out to users fastest, Targeted release is definitely the way to go. Standard will always lag a bit because it's broader rollout. Pretty sure that's how it works based on recent practice stuff. Someone correct me if I'm off!
Q: 2
You are a Microsoft 36S administrator for a company.
Microsoft plans to release a new feature for Microsoft Excel.
You need to ensure that the feature becomes available for employees to install as soon as possible To
which release channel should you subscribe?
Options
Discussion
D . Targeted release always gets new features out to users first for Microsoft 365, so you don't have to wait for standard deployment. Saw something like this in another exam report too.
Probably D, saw similar wording in an exam dump and Targeted release was the expected pick.
Had something like this in a mock, D
Probably D for this one. Targeted release is how you get the features to your users ASAP, while Standard is safer but slower. Pretty sure that's what MS recommends for early access. Agree or am I missing something?
D , Targeted release always gets new features out to users first. If the goal is ASAP install for employees, this is the only option that fits. The others (especially Standard release) are more about stability and wider rollout, not speed. Pretty confident but open if anyone thinks otherwise.
D , since targeted release pushes new stuff first. Install ASAP lines up with that channel. Not seeing how B beats it.
D-Targeted release is the earliest for new features, so that's the right choice if speed matters. Pretty sure about this, anyone disagree?
D , Targeted release is what gets features out first, B is a trap if you’re thinking standard rollout.
C or D, pretty close but I was thinking C since "Office 365 team release" sounds like it would push features out for pilot groups really quickly too. Not sure if that's an actual release channel name though, so could be mixing up terms here.
D
Man, Microsoft keeps changing the naming conventions, it gets confusing. For getting new features out to users fastest, Targeted release is definitely the way to go. Standard will always lag a bit because it's broader rollout. Pretty sure that's how it works based on recent practice stuff. Someone correct me if I'm off!
Man, Microsoft keeps changing the naming conventions, it gets confusing. For getting new features out to users fastest, Targeted release is definitely the way to go. Standard will always lag a bit because it's broader rollout. Pretty sure that's how it works based on recent practice stuff. Someone correct me if I'm off!
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 2 of 35