Q: 12
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in
the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might
have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these
questions will not appear in the review screen.
Your company has a Microsoft 365 subscription.
You need to prevent a user named User1 from permanently deleting private chats in Microsoft
Teams.
Solution: You place the group mailboxes used by Microsoft Teams on Litigation Hold.
Does this meet the goal?
Options
Discussion
Option B. Litigation Hold doesn't prevent deleting Teams private chats, easy to miss that trap.
Looks like B, saw something similar in recent exam reports. Litigation Hold doesn't actually stop Teams chat deletions.
B vs A, B is right here. Litigation Hold is often a gotcha since it doesn't actually stop Teams chat deletion, only mail in Exchange. This catches people out on practice tests.
Feels like B, because Litigation Hold targets mailboxes for email retention, not Teams private chat content. You'd need Teams retention policies to actually prevent deletion in chats. Open to other thoughts if anyone's seen this tested differently.
A but if the requirement was to just preserve all messages, would putting Teams chats on eDiscovery hold work instead?
Be respectful. No spam.
