1. Massachusetts Common Law: The determination of a fixture in Massachusetts relies on common law principles established through court decisions. The primary test is the intention of the party affixing the item. As established in Stone v. Livingston, 222 Mass. 192, 194-95 (1915), "The intention to be sought is not the undisclosed purpose of the owner, but the intention implied and manifested by his act." A custom-built item strongly manifests an intent for it to be a permanent addition.
2. Academic Publication (Law Review): Squillante, A. M. (1964). The Law of Fixtures: Common Law and the Uniform Commercial Code. Commercial Law Journal, 15(2), 115-128. This article discusses the three-part test for fixtures: (1) annexation to the realty, (2) adaptation to the use of that part of the realty, and (3) the intention of the party making the annexation. The custom-built nature of the cabinet strongly supports the adaptation and intention tests, which can override a lack of physical annexation.
3. University Courseware: University of California, Berkeley, Law, Property Law Course Materials (Prof. S. Sugarman). Course outlines on the "Law of Fixtures" consistently teach that adaptation can be a critical factor. An object is a fixture if it is essential to the purpose for which the building was constructed or is used, even with minimal physical attachment. The custom-built cabinet fits this principle of "constructive annexation." (Reference to general property law principles taught in accredited law school programs).