:

:

:

:

:

:

Referring to the exhibit for a multinode HA environment, we can conclude the following about the

HA setup:

Two Services Redundancy Groups (Correct: Option A):

The output shows the status of SRG 0 and SRG 1, confirming that there are two services redundancy

groups in the HA configuration.

Node 1 Hosting SRG 1 (Correct: Option C):

The exhibit indicates that Node 1 is currently active for SRG 1. According to the configuration, Node 1

will continue to host SRG 1 unless it becomes unavailable.

Session State Synchronization (Correct: Option D):

In this HA setup, session state synchronization is enabled between the two nodes. This ensures that

sessions remain active and seamless failover can occur if one node fails.

Juniper Reference:

Juniper HA Documentation: Provides details on multinode HA setups, SRG configurations, and

session synchronization.

:

Comprehensive Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation with All Juniper Security Reference

Understanding the Problem:

The goal is to bypass IDP for traffic destined to social media sites using Application-Based Policy

Routing (APBR).

Despite the configuration, IDP is still dropping the sessions.

Need to identify two reasons why this is happening.

Key Concepts:

Application-Based Policy Routing (APBR): Allows routing decisions based on the application identified

in the traffic.

IDP (Intrusion Detection and Prevention): Monitors network traffic for malicious activity and can drop

suspicious packets.

Bypassing IDP: To bypass IDP for certain traffic, specific configurations are required within the APBR

rule.

Option A: IDP disable is not configured on the APBR rule.

To bypass IDP for specific traffic using APBR, you must explicitly configure the idp-disable option

within the APBR rule.

Without this configuration, even if APBR redirects the traffic, IDP will still inspect and potentially

drop the traffic.

Reference:

Juniper Networks Documentation:

"To bypass IDP processing for traffic matching an APBR rule, include the idp-disable statement in the

rule configuration."

Source: Juniper TechLibrary - Configuring APBR to Bypass IDP

Option D: The session did not properly reclassify midstream to the correct APBR rule.

Midstream Reclassification: APBR relies on application identification, which may occur after several

packets have been exchanged (not just the first packet).

When the application is identified mid-session, the session should be reclassified according to the

correct APBR rule.

If midstream reclassification does not occur properly, the session continues under the initial policy,

and IDP continues to inspect and potentially drop the traffic.

Possible Causes:

Session Setup Issues: If the session was established before the application was identified, and

reclassification is not enabled or not functioning, the session won't switch to the APBR rule that

bypasses IDP.

Configuration Errors: Incorrect or missing configuration for midstream reclassification.

Reference:

Juniper Networks Documentation:

"For APBR to reclassify sessions after the application is identified, ensure that midstream

reclassification is enabled."

Source: Juniper TechLibrary - Understanding APBR and Midstream Reclassification

Why Options B and C are Incorrect:

Option B: The application services bypass is not configured on the APBR rule.

There is no specific application-services bypass option within APBR rules for bypassing IDP.

To bypass IDP, the idp-disable option must be used.

Application services bypass generally refers to bypassing other services like UTM, not specifically IDP

within APBR.

Reference:

Juniper Networks Documentation:

"APBR rules can include the idp-disable statement to bypass IDP. There is no application-services

bypass statement for APBR."

Option C: The APBR rule does a match on the first packet.

By default, APBR can match on the first packet, but for applications that require deeper inspection,

you can configure the rule to not match on the first packet.

Matching on the first packet is generally beneficial for routing decisions.

In this scenario, matching on the first packet is not the reason why IDP is dropping the session.

Reference:

Juniper Networks Documentation:

"If you configure APBR to match on the first packet, the routing decision is made immediately. If the

application is not identified on the first packet, the default routing is used until the application is

identified."

Conclusion:

Correct Answers:

A. IDP disable is not configured on the APBR rule.

Without idp-disable, IDP will continue to inspect and possibly drop the traffic matching the APBR

rule.

D. The session did not properly reclassify midstream to the correct APBR rule.

If midstream reclassification fails, the session remains under the initial policy, and IDP processing

continues.

Resolution Steps:

Configure idp-disable: Ensure that the APBR rule includes the idp-disable statement to bypass IDP for

the specified traffic.

arduino

Copy code

set security application-path-routing rule then idp-disable

Enable Midstream Reclassification: Verify that midstream reclassification is enabled and functioning

correctly to reclassify sessions once the application is identified.

Note: Midstream reclassification is enabled by default, but verify that no configuration is preventing

it.

Additional Reference:

Juniper TechLibrary:

"Application-Based Policy Routing Overview" - Provides an overview of APBR features and

configurations.

Source: Juniper TechLibrary - APBR Overview

"Configuring IDP Policy Bypass" - Discusses how to bypass IDP for specific traffic.

Source: Juniper TechLibrary - Configuring IDP Bypass

Juniper Networks Day One Book:

"Advanced Security Policies" - Offers insights into configuring advanced security policies, including

APBR and IDP interactions.

Persistent NAT with target host allows external hosts to establish connections only when the internal

device initiates a session first, ideal for specific interactive applications. Refer to Juniper Persistent

NAT Documentation.

The scenario requires that external hosts be able to initiate a connection only if the internal device

has already initiated a connection. The correct solution is Persistent NAT with target host, which

ensures that a specific external host can initiate new connections back to the internal device, but

only after the internal device has established a session first.

Persistent NAT with Target Host (Answer C): This allows the internal device to initiate a connection,

and once established, the specified external host can also initiate new connections to the internal

device on the same NAT mapping.

Example Configuration:

bash

set security nat source persistent-nat permit target-host-port

This solution is appropriate when controlled bidirectional communication is required based on an

internal-initiated connection.

Reference: Juniper persistent NAT documentation.