You are advertising a summary route that represents your local network (172.20.0.0716) to both ISP
A and ISPB. You want to influence all traffic sent to you from ISP C to go through R2.
How would you accomplish this task?I thought B might work since changing the local preference to 250 on R1 would prioritize that path, but I realize now that's only effective inside your own AS. If you want ISP C to pick R2, local preference on R1 won't actually influence their decision. Still, I assumed increasing it would somehow help influence upstream choices. Anyone else pick B at first?
I went with B for this one. Raising local preference on R1 to 250 seems like it would make traffic favor that path, and I've seen similar tips in some BGP labs. If we're just trying to steer traffic coming into our AS from ISP C, I figure bumping up the local pref is enough. Not 100% but that was my logic. Someone correct me if I'm off here?
Referring to the exhibit, you have an established RSVP LSP between R1 and R4 when you experience
a link failure between R2 and R3.
Which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
You are asked to assign interface xe-1/0/5 to a virtual switch.
What must be accomplished to complete the configuration?
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
Which prefix in the output shown in the exhibit is an external prefix injected by an OSPF router?