I don't think it's B. D fits better since standard changes are pre-approved and repeatable, so they're exactly what service request management is set up to handle. Normal changes need extra authorization, not just a request. I'm pretty sure it's D but let me know if I'm missing something.
My pick: C makes the most sense because ITIL's focus is resolving incidents that cause major business disruption first. Prioritizing incidents is all about handling the biggest impact fast, not just making teams work together (that's not really the primary reason). Pretty sure C is what they're looking for here, but if anyone can argue for D, let me know!
Option C is correct. Incidents are prioritized so the most critical (impactful) ones get fixed first, keeping the business running smoothly. It's about making sure limited resources go where they're needed most, not just matching or escalating incidents blindly. Pretty sure that's the ITIL intent here, but open if someone sees it differently.
C all day. ITIL focuses on restoring service for incidents causing the biggest business impact, not just getting teams to work together. Saw a similar one in some exam reports and they always highlighted business priority as key. Pretty sure C is the way, but let me know if I'm missing something here.
Definitely D here. Guiding principles in ITIL are those general recommendations you follow when adopting service management, not capabilities or activities like in C or A. Pretty sure about this, but let me know if anyone thinks the context is different.
I don’t think “Organizations and people” is right-tricky wording but ITIL v4 treats the managed knowledge for services as part of “Information and technology”. Option A gets folks who mix up people's skills vs. actual info assets. Anyone else see it differently?
This one could be tricky if you think about Service Level Management (C), since that handles agreements, but it’s really about measurement not ongoing value creation. "Relationship management" in D is what actually keeps things collaborative long term. I think D, unless they're asking specifically about contract compliance?
Had something like this in a mock, pretty sure the answer is D. Service relationship management keeps both provider and consumer collaborating for ongoing value creation, not just delivering an offering. Disagree?
Not sure why D keeps coming up, since that's more about incident management. Monitoring and event management is all about tracking the state changes in services, which fits B. Anyone else see tricky wording like this on similar ITIL questions?
Gotta go with B here. Service level management is the one tasked with defining and agreeing on metrics that actually matter to the customer, like SLAs or experience targets. A (Continual improvement) uses those metrics to make things better but doesn't set them up in the first place, I think. Let me know if you see it differently!