1. COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission). (2017). Enterprise Risk Management—Integrating with Strategy and Performance. The executive summary and subsequent chapters discuss the evolution of ERM in response to a changing business landscape. It explicitly notes drivers such as "The proliferation of data and technology" and "The increasing complexity of business" (related to globalization). While it introduces the importance of ESG, the framework's evolution is heavily rooted in the longer-standing technological, strategic, and financial shifts.
2. World Economic Forum. (2023). The Global Risks Report 2023. This report, and its preceding editions, illustrates the shifting risk landscape. While environmental risks like "Failure to mitigate climate change" now dominate the long-term outlook (p. 6, Figure 1), reports from a decade prior (e.g., 2013) were more focused on economic and financial risks like "Major systemic financial failure." This demonstrates the more recent ascent of climate change as a primary driver in the global risk discourse compared to established financial concerns.
3. ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines. Clause 5.4.1, "Understanding the organization and its context," requires organizations to consider the external environment, which includes "financial, technological, economic, natural and competitive" factors. While the standard acknowledges the natural environment as a source of risk, academic and industry literature confirms that the dramatic, practice-altering changes from technology, globalization, and finance have a longer history in shaping modern ERM.