Q: 5
After the implementation of internal of Things (IoT) devices, new risk scenarios were identified.
What is the PRIMARY reason to report this information to risk owners?
Options
Discussion
Option D similar exam questions recommend the official study guide and practice tests for this topic.
Probably D. Reporting is mainly about confirming the effect of new IoT risk scenarios on the overall risk profile, not jumping to controls or policy yet. Seems like that's what they want here, but open if someone has a different read.
Makes sense to me, it's D. Main thing is to check how these new IoT risks shift the overall risk profile, not jump straight to controls. Pretty sure about this but open to other views if I've missed something.
D for sure. The main thing is risk owners need to review if these IoT risks actually change the overall risk profile before taking any action. Pretty sure that's what ISACA is looking for here, but open to other views.
Saw something similar in a practice test, the answer is D.
D
D , reporting to risk owners is really about making sure any new IoT risks are reflected in the current risk profile. Controls come later, first step is assessing overall impact. Pretty confident here but let me know if I missed something.
D , B is tempting but the question wants the main reason for reporting not acting. Trap for picking controls too fast.
Had something like this in a mock, correct pick is D.
Pretty sure it's B here. Seen similar practice questions where adding new controls is the go-to after finding new IoT risks. Check official guide and sample exams for more on this.
Be respectful. No spam.