1. HPE White Paper: HPE Storage and Hyperconverged Solutions for Disaster Recovery. This document frequently emphasizes the role of automation and orchestration in achieving aggressive RTOs. It states, "Automation is key to meeting aggressive RTOs and RPOs... Orchestration tools like VMware Site Recovery Manager (SRM) or Zerto can automate the entire site failover and failback process." It also discusses how replication technologies, influenced by distance (proximity), determine recovery capabilities. (Reference specific sections on Automation and Replication Technologies).
2. HPE Technical White Paper: HPE Primera and HPE 3PAR Remote Copy. This document details how replication works and how distance impacts performance. In discussions of Synchronous and Asynchronous replication modes, it implicitly links data proximity (latency) to recovery capabilities. Synchronous replication, which requires close proximity, offers a near-zero RTO for data availability, while asynchronous replication, used over longer distances, results in a higher RTO. (See sections on "Synchronous Long Distance Mode" and "Replication Modes").
3. Purdue University, "Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning." University courseware on BCP/DR consistently identifies two primary factors in RTO calculation: the time to restore infrastructure and the time to restore data. Automation directly addresses infrastructure restoration time, while data proximity (affecting transfer rates) is a key variable in data restoration time. (See course materials on "Key Metrics: RPO and RTO").