Q: 14
How can you ensure service level agreements (SLAs) are being met in a monitored data center
environment?
Options
Discussion
Option A, but if any sub-control isn't in place (like missing audits), then compliance could fail even with alerts.
All three (alerts, reports, and audits) are needed to really track SLAs in practice. If you just do one, you could miss breaches or trends. I think A is the best coverage here, but open to pushback if anyone sees a gap.
A
Probably A here, since you really need all those steps combined to make sure SLAs don’t slip. Alerts, reports, and audits each cover a different angle. Pretty sure that’s what they want.
Nah, I think A is right. Picking just B, C, or D alone leaves gaps since monitoring, reporting, and auditing all catch different issues. The other options are tempting but don’t fully cover it.
A covers everything-alerts, reports, and audits all play a part in catching issues and actually proving compliance. Just one control isn’t enough to guarantee SLAs get met. Happened to see similar in past HP sets, so pretty confident here. Agree?
I’d say A, since relying on just alerts or audits can miss gaps, but combining all three controls really covers monitoring, reporting, and compliance. D is strong for proofs but not the whole picture. Seen similar logic on other HP questions.
Ugh, classic HP making it a trick question. D imo
Be respectful. No spam.
