Q: 9
Refer to Exhibit:
With Access-1, What needs to be identically configured With MSTP to load-balance VLANS?
With Access-1, What needs to be identically configured With MSTP to load-balance VLANS?Options
Discussion
Probably B, that's the VLAN-to-instance mapping. That config has to be identical for MSTP load balancing to work right. The other options are more about protection, not splitting traffic across instances. Pretty sure but always good to double check.
Option B. kind of guessing here. Pretty sure the vlan mapping must match so MSTP can load-balance right? Anyone else confirm?
Its D
B makes sense since MSTP uses identical VLAN-to-instance mapping for load balancing. Each switch must have the same mapping. Anyone disagree?
D , had something like this in a mock exam and picked D for root-guard setting with MSTP.
B
B . VLAN-to-instance mapping is what MSTP needs to be identical across all switches if you want load balancing between VLANs. The others don't affect how VLANs are distributed per instance. Someone correct me if I missed something.
B . The VLAN-to-instance mapping under MSTP is what needs to match across switches for load balancing to work. The other options are protections or settings but don't control which VLANs use which instance. Pretty sure it's B but let me know if I'm missing something.
B , it's the VLAN-to-instance mapping that MSTP needs to be identical for load balancing to work. The other options don't control how VLANs are split among instances. Pretty sure that's what the question wants, but open if someone disagrees.
D tbh, saw something like this on a practice test.
Be respectful. No spam.
