Q: 6
You are building a configuration in Central that will be used for a standardized network design for
small sites for your company, you want to use GUI configuration for gateways and Aps, while
template configuration for switches. You need to align with Aruba best practices.
Which set of actions will satisfy these requirements?
Options
Discussion
B makes sense. Groups in Central align with config method, so APs/gateways (GUI) together, switches (template) separate. Works per Aruba docs.
B , seen this layout in exam reports and it fits Aruba's best practice.
Not sure why C would be picked, since APs/gateways (GUI config) and switches (template) need different groups. Shouldn’t it be B?
B , saw a similar setup in an Aruba practice and it works as expected.
C's not it, B. Need one group for switches (template) and a second for APs/gateways (GUI config).
Makes sense to me, B matches Aruba's group config rules. You need separate groups if you're mixing GUI and template methods. Sites are just for locations, not how config is delivered. Pretty sure B is right.
A is wrong, B. Site vs group separation matters here.
Be respectful. No spam.