Q: 14
Which of the following statements is false about the default processing of the next hop address when
a BGP device advertises a route?
Options
Discussion
Option B is the false one here. By default, when you send a route from an EBGP peer to an IBGP peer, BGP keeps the original next hop unchanged-doesn't swap it to the local interface unless you use next-hop-self. Pretty sure about this but open to corrections.
B/C? If you look at a strict default config, B is technically false because when a BGP router advertises a route learned from EBGP to an IBGP peer, the next hop isn't changed by default. I've seen some practice exams trip people up over whether the interface address is swapped here. Pretty sure it's B unless there's a scenario with next-hop-self set. Anyone disagree?
Honestly I'm a bit confused here but I think it's B. From what I remember, BGP doesn't change the next hop when sending a route from EBGP to IBGP by default, you have to use next-hop-self. Can someone confirm if that's right?
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 14 of 30