Q: 3
Which of the following GitHub syntax formats is consistent with the associated text?
Options
Discussion
Probably C, since that's the real comment syntax in Markdown. E looks close but that's visible, not hidden. Agree?
Nah, not D. C matches the actual comment syntax, D is a trap since that's just plain text.
C saw this style on a practice set and matches what actual GitHub Markdown expects for comments.
Option D.
Don’t think E fits, since E is visible and the question seems to ask about syntax tied to function, not just output. I’m picking C because
<!- This is a comment -> is the actual hidden comment syntax for GitHub Markdown. Tricky if you misread, but pretty sure that’s what they want.Not sure why E keeps coming up here, it's not matching the actual syntax the question wants. C is the real comment format, E would just be an ordered list and that's not what they're looking for.
Pretty sure it's C, looks like the right syntax for a comment. Someone confirm?
I don’t think C is right-D fits if you go by the text matching the visible result.
C , that's the real comment syntax in GitHub Markdown, not visible to users. Official guide and practice tests push this point. If they meant rendered text, I could see confusion but pretty sure it's C.
C for me, matches the typical Markdown comment style that doesn't render. The rest either show on the page or use the wrong syntax. Pretty sure that's the point here but open to other logic if I'm missing something.
Be respectful. No spam.