Q: 8
An organization wants granular control over who can use and see their generative AI models and
related resources on Google Cloud. Which Google Cloud security offering is specifically for this
purpose?
Options
Discussion
Option A, Pretty sure IAM is what you need for tight access control on resources. Can anyone confirm if that's right?
Maybe A . IAM is what actually lets you set who can access and manage AI resources, way more granular than monitoring or security centers. Not seeing any other choice that fits the "who can use and see" part.
C or A. I was thinking Security Command Center (C) because it sounds like it protects and manages resources, but maybe that's more about detection instead of actual access control like IAM. Not totally sure here, C just seemed right from a security tool angle. Agree?
A is the best fit, since with IAM you can assign very specific permissions to users or groups for generative AI resources. The others mostly provide visibility or infra-level protection, not precise access control. Pretty confident but open to pushback if someone sees it differently.
Would Security Command Center (C) actually give that kind of granular control over usage, though?
A , IAM is literally designed for fine-grained access. Lets you pick who can view or use AI models, way more control than just monitoring. Unless the question was about tracking usage, I'd stick with A here. If anyone disagrees, would be curious why.
Yeah, it's A for sure if the goal is actual access control. IAM lets you assign very specific permissions for resources, including generative AI models in Google Cloud. Unless they're just asking about monitoring, I think IAM matches best. Agree?
Seen this on a practice test, it's A. Check the official guide for IAM details.
I don't think it's C, even though Security Command Center has monitoring features. For true granular access, it's A.
A , that's the only one for actual access control over AI models. Monitoring tools just track activity, not permissions.
Be respectful. No spam.
