Q: 4
When a customer delegate the installation and management of its SD-WAN infrastructure to an
MSSP, the MSSP usually keeps the hub within its infrastructure for ease of management and to share
costly resources.
In which two situations will the MSSP install the hub in customer premises? (Choose two.)
Options
Discussion
A and B tbh
C/D?
Its A and B, but only if SIA has to go through customer’s on-prem security (not MSSP hosted). Also, lots of branch-to-branch traffic makes the remote hub inefficient. If those aren’t strict requirements, the choice could flip.
I don't think D is right here. A and B are the ones that really force the MSSP to put the hub onsite, since branch-to-branch traffic and SIA with centralized breakout both make remote hosting a problem. Sometimes C looks tempting but it's a trap.
Definitely A and B for this scenario. Centralized breakout with SIA (A) and heavy inter-branch traffic (B) both make the on-prem hub necessary. C and D might help performance but they don’t absolutely require moving the hub onsite. Pretty confident but open to other views.
A and B make sense. If there's a ton of branch-to-branch traffic (B), having the hub on-prem reduces latency, so the MSSP would set it up that way. For A, if Secure Internet Access has to go through customer-controlled security appliances, then obviously you need the hub on-site. Not totally sure if C or D ever force it but pretty sure it's A and B here. Disagree?
Option A, but I could see B too. Not fully sure.
A or B. Pretty sure it's these two, since branch-to-branch traffic (B) means you want low latency, so hub goes on-prem. Same for A if SIA has to use customer-controlled security. C and D look tempting but don't force on-prem hub. Disagree?
Looks like C and D to me. Saw similar phrasing in some practice labs, so I'd check the official study guide and sample tests for this scenario.
If the customer's SIA requires their own on-prem security, isn't A valid? Otherwise, why wouldn't the MSSP hub be enough?
Be respectful. No spam.