Q: 7
Refer to the exhibit.
An administrator is deploying a hub and spokes network and using OSPF as dynamic protocol.
Which configuration is mandatory for neighbor adjacency?
An administrator is deploying a hub and spokes network and using OSPF as dynamic protocol.
Which configuration is mandatory for neighbor adjacency?Options
Discussion
Makes sense to go with B here. In hub and spoke OSPF, setting network-type to point-to-multipoint on the hub ensures neighbors come up without extra configs for DR/BDR. I think that's what's required but let me know if you see it differently.
Option B
Maybe D, since virtual-link is needed for some OSPF scenarios in hub and spoke setups.
B
I don’t think it’s D, pretty sure it should be B. Virtual-link is a classic trap for OSPF multi-area stuff but not for hub-and-spoke neighbor formation. Open to other takes if I missed a detail.
B is the only required config here to form OSPF adjacencies in hub-and-spoke. Others are optional or for different setups.
B , setting network-type to point-to-multipoint on the hub is usually what makes adjacencies work in a hub-and-spoke OSPF setup. The others aren't required just to get neighbors up. Pretty sure it's B but open to corrections if someone's seen otherwise.
B fits here, since for OSPF to form proper neighbor adjacencies in hub and spoke setups, you need the network-type set to point-to-multipoint. The others aren't required just for adjacency. Pretty sure I'm right but always open to more input.
B
C/D? I saw similar scenarios in official practice, so check the admin guide too.
Be respectful. No spam.