1. Cisco Systems
Inc.
"Congestion Management Overview" in QoS: Congestion Management Configuration Guide
Cisco IOS XE Release 3S. The section on "Priority Queuing" states: "PQ ensures that important traffic gets the quickest handling at the expense of other traffic... If traffic in a higher-priority queue is constant
traffic in all lower-priority queues can be completely blocked (a condition called starvation)." This directly supports answers A and C.
2. Kurose
J. F.
& Ross
K. W. (2017). Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th ed.). Pearson. In Chapter 7
Section 7.2.2 "Scheduling
" the text describes Priority Queuing: "a packet from a low-priority queue can be transmitted only when all of the higher-priority queues are empty... a continuous stream of high-priority packets can block out all low-priority packets." This confirms that high-priority traffic gets minimal delay (A) at the risk of starving low-priority traffic (C).
3. Stallings
W. (2014). Data and Computer Communications (10th ed.). Pearson. In Chapter 19
Section 19.2 "Resource Allocation
" the discussion on "Priority Queuing" explains that this method gives preferential treatment to high-priority packets
which are always chosen for transmission over low-priority packets. It highlights the risk of lower-priority queues being starved for service. This supports both A and C.