B and D make sense here since only Standalone AS ABAP (SAP_BASIS 752+) or S/4HANA 1809+ systems have the capability to actually run the S/4-specific ATC checks with the simplification DB. ECC just acts as a source in remote analysis. Pretty sure that's right based on migration docs, but open to corrections if anyone’s tried otherwise.
I don’t think it’s just B here. In this DMO phase, each process bucket is actually a pair (export/import) so 40 buckets means 80 R3load processes running. People often mix up the "bucket" count for actual process count.
Wouldn't A also count as a prep task? I've read in some guides that early data migration steps sometimes start alongside compatibility checks. Official SAP materials or practice questions might clarify this, but I could be missing a nuance here.
C/D for this. In the prep phase you handle custom code checks (C) and sort out simplification item issues (D), but the actual data or DB migrations are done later. That lines up with what I've seen in project guides, but open to debate if anyone's seen B earlier in a real plan.
I don't think it's B. D is the one where SUM technically reads the umodauto.lst file to identify the adjustment transports. The SAP_ADJUST project thing is more about grouping, not recognition. Let me know if anyone saw it work differently.
umodauto.lst file to actually recognize the relevant transports. B is tempting since SAP_ADJUST is used, but that's for grouping, not recognition. Seen similar in practice questions, so pretty confident unless there's some edge case I'm missing.If UPGANA.XML comes from a run on a different landscape or with changed custom code, wouldn’t that skew the SUM progress accuracy? The file's usefulness depends on matching environments. Isn’t there a potential caveat there?