The risk of an evil twin attack on mobile devices is PRIMARILY due to the use of generic names that

mobile devices will accept without verification. An evil twin attack is a type of wireless network

attack where an attacker sets up a rogue access point that mimics a legitimate one. The attacker can

then lure unsuspecting users to connect to the rogue access point and intercept their data or launch

further attacks. Mobile devices are vulnerable to evil twin attacks because they often use generic

names for their wireless networks, such as “Free WiFi” or “Public Hotspot”. These names can be

easily spoofed by an attacker and accepted by mobile devices without verifying the identity or

security of the access point.

A feature of a stateful inspection firewall is that it is capable of detecting and blocking sophisticated

attacks. A stateful inspection firewall is a type of firewall that monitors and analyzes the state and

context of network traffic. It keeps track of the source, destination, protocol, port, and session

information of each packet and compares it with a set of predefined rules. A stateful inspection

firewall can detect and block attacks that exploit the logic or behavior of network protocols or

applications, such as fragmentation attacks, session hijacking, or application-layer attacks.

When passwords are used in key generation, they serve as a component of the encryption process.

The strength of the encryption algorithm itself is not inherently affected by the use of passwords for

key generation. Instead, the security of the encryption relies on the strength and complexity of the

password, the key generation process, and the encryption algorithm’s resilience to attacks. A strong,

complex password can contribute to a robust encryption key, thereby maintaining the intended

strength of the encryption algorithm.

Reference: While I cannot provide direct

from the ISACA Cybersecurity Audit Manual, it is

generally understood in cybersecurity practices that the encryption algorithm’s strength is

determined by its design and resistance to cryptanalysis, not solely by the elements used in key

generation. The use of passwords in key generation is a common practice and, when implemented

correctly, does not diminish the algorithm’s strength. For specific references, please consult the

ISACA Cybersecurity Audit resources or related study guides.

SSH, or Secure Shell, is a network protocol that operates at the Application layer of the OSI model.

This is the topmost layer, which allows users to interact with the network through applications. SSH

provides a secure channel over an unsecured network in a client-server architecture, enabling users

to log into another computer over a network, to execute commands in a remote machine, and to

move files from one machine to another.

Reference: The information aligns with the OSI model’s definition, where the Application layer is

responsible for providing network services to the applications of the user12.

The presence of known dangerous artifacts like malicious IP addresses or domain names on a

network typically indicates that a security breach has occurred or is in progress. These artifacts are

often recognized as indicators of compromise (IoCs), which are pieces of forensic data, such as

system log entries or files, that identify potentially malicious activity on a system or network.

Identifying IoCs is crucial for cybersecurity as it allows organizations to detect breaches quickly and

respond to them promptly.

Reference: The concept of indicators of compromise is a fundamental aspect of cybersecurity audits,

as it relates to the identification and analysis of evidence that points to a security incident. This is

covered in various ISACA resources, including the Cybersecurity Audit Certificate Study Guide, which

provides guidance on understanding risk and implementing controls to protect against cyber

threats1.

Using a data loss prevention (DLP) solution to monitor data saved to a USB memory device is an

example of managing data at rest. Data at rest is data that is stored on a device or media, such as

hard disks, flash drives, tapes, or CDs. Data at rest can be exposed to unauthorized access, theft, or

loss if not properly protected. A DLP solution is a tool that monitors and controls the movement and

usage of data across an organization’s network or endpoints. A DLP solution can prevent users from

saving sensitive data to removable devices or alert on any violations of data policies.

Specific, mandatory controls or rules to support and comply with a policy are known as standards.

This is because standards define the minimum level of performance or behavior that is expected

from an organization or its employees in order to achieve a policy objective or requirement.

Standards also provide clear and measurable criteria for auditing and monitoring compliance with

policies. The other options are not specific, mandatory controls or rules to support and comply with a

policy, but rather different types of documents or tools that provide guidance or recommendations

for implementing policies or controls, such as frameworks (A), guidelines (B), or baselines C.

A cloud service provider is used to perform analytics on an organization’s sensitive data. A data

leakage incident occurs in the service provider’s network. From a regulatory perspective, the

organization is responsible for the data breach. This is because the organization is the data owner

and has the ultimate accountability and liability for the security and privacy of its data, regardless of

where it is stored or processed. The organization cannot transfer or delegate its responsibility to the

service provider, even if there is a contractual agreement or service level agreement that specifies

the security obligations of the service provider. The other options are not correct, because they

either imply that the service provider is responsible (A), or that the responsibility depends on the

nature of breach (B) or specific regulatory requirements C, which are not relevant factors.

One of the known potential risks of using a Software Defined Perimeter (SDP) controller is

unauthorized access, which can jeopardize the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of data. SDP

controllers work by creating a boundary around network resources, but if an unauthorized user gains

access, perhaps through stolen credentials or exploitation of a vulnerability, they could potentially

access sensitive data or disrupt services.

Reference: The information provided here is based on standard cybersecurity practices and

principles, which are likely to be consistent with those found in ISACA’s Cybersecurity Audit

resources. For specific

, please consult the ISACA Cybersecurity Audit Manual or related

study guides12345.

The MOST important step to determine the risks posed to an organization by social media is to

review access control processes for the organization’s social media accounts. This is because access

control processes help to ensure that only authorized users can access, modify, or share the

organization’s social media accounts and content, and prevent unauthorized or malicious access or

disclosure of sensitive or confidential information. Access control processes also help to protect the

organization’s reputation and brand image from being compromised or damaged by unauthorized or

inappropriate social media posts. The other options are not as important as reviewing access control

processes for the organization’s social media accounts, because they either relate to costs (A),

insurance (B), or recovery C aspects that are not directly related to the risks posed by social media.