C again. Had something like this in a mock and inverse square law was the right pick. It describes how RF signal strength drops off as distance increases. Fresnel zone is a different concept so pretty sure it isn't A. Agree?
Yeah, A is a must since more clients always means less bandwidth per station. C makes sense too because even with non-overlapping channels, nearby APs can still leak some interference. I think those two are the biggest factors, unless I'm missing something with the question wording. Agree?
D is the one. Excessive VSWR comes from an impedance mismatch between components, not antenna gain or radio output. Saw something like this in a practice set and the explanation was super clear for once!
Doesn’t B also count for prep work? Security requirements sometimes affect where APs go, especially with compliance in mind. Maybe not as critical as checking floor plans, but still relevant before the actual predictive design step?
I get where you’re coming from, but it’s C. In 802.11, if the sender doesn’t get an ACK, it assumes the frame didn’t make it and triggers a retransmit. B seems logical at first but without an ACK the protocol can't just assume delivery. Pretty sure about this but let me know if I’m off.
Option B makes the most sense because OFDM first appeared in 802.11a and then got adopted by ERP (11g), HT (11n), and VHT (11ac) PHYs. The other options either mix up modulation types or bands (like C, which isn't accurate since 2.4 GHz devices can use OFDM too). I'm pretty sure about B but open if someone's got another angle.