1. ISTQB® Certified Tester Foundation Level Automotive Software Tester Syllabus (v1.0). (2018). International Software Testing Qualifications Board.
Section 3.2.2, X-in-the-Loop (XiL), Page 31: "Component testing is typically performed in MiL and SiL environments. Integration testing is typically performed in SiL and HiL environments. System testing is typically performed in a HiL environment and in the vehicle." This directly supports option D and refutes option A.
Section 1.2, ISO 26262, Page 10: This section explains that ISO 26262 defines all activities in the development lifecycle, including testing, to achieve functional safety. This refutes the claim in option C that classification has no influence.
2. Schäuffele, J., & Zurawka, T. (2010). Automotive Software Engineering: Principles, Processes, Methods, and Tools. SAE International.
Chapter 7, Section 7.3, "Test Stages", Pages 188-191: This chapter maps test stages to the V-model, explicitly associating Model-in-the-Loop and Software-in-the-Loop with component/unit tests, and Hardware-in-the-Loop with integration and system tests. This confirms the specific roles of each environment.
3. ISO 26262-6:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 6: Product development at the software level.
Clause 9, "Software unit verification" & Clause 10, "Software integration and verification": These clauses detail the required objectives and methods for verification at the component (unit) and integration levels. The choice of test environment (e.g., MiL, SiL, HiL) is a direct implementation of the methods required by the standard to satisfy safety requirements, directly contradicting option C.