1. ISTQB® Certified Tester Foundation Level Automotive Software Tester Syllabus Version 1.0 (2018).
Section 1.3.1, ISO 26262, page 10: "The standard defines the requirements for the processes and the work products for the development of safety-related E/E systems... The required activities and work products depend on the Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL)." This confirms that ISO 26262 requirements are dependent on criticality (ASIL).
Section 1.3.2, Automotive SPICE (ASPICE), page 11: "Automotive SPICE is a framework for assessing the capability of the development processes for software-based systems... The process assessment model is used to perform a conformity assessment of the processes of an organization." This confirms ASPICE's objective is to assess process capability.
2. ISO 26262-1:2018, "Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 1: Vocabulary".
Section 3.8, Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL): The standard defines ASIL as the mechanism for specifying "the item's or element's necessary requirements of ISO 26262 and safety measures to apply for avoiding an unreasonable residual risk." This establishes the direct link between criticality (ASIL) and the required processes.
3. Weyer, T., Folmer, J., & Mäder, P. (2012). "A Comparison of Automotive SPICE and ISO 26262." Software Quality Professional, 14(4), 23-31.
Page 24: The paper states, "ISO 26262 is a standard for functional safety... The required level of rigor depends on the ASIL." It further clarifies, "Automotive SPICE is a process assessment model... It is used to evaluate the capability of development processes." This academic source clearly distinguishes the ASIL-dependent nature of ISO 26262 from the process capability focus of ASPICE.