Q: 6
Which of the following statements about the reuse of TAS artefacts is TRUE?
Options
Discussion
A . Official guide and practice tests both point out reusable artefacts can be in different TAA layers.
Option A B is a common trap here, since good design isn't enough for reuse by itself.
C vs D for me, not sure. C kinda makes sense since maintaining and improving communication about artefacts would help with reuse over the whole lifecycle, not just at design. But D seems like a trap because adaptors are more about integration than pure reuse. Anyone else think C fits here?
A over B. Some folks pick B but that's not fully right, you need more than just a good design to achieve reuse-there's actual ongoing work involved. A is more in line with ISTQB's concept that reusable artefacts span different TAA layers. Agree?
A here imo. TAS artefacts can totally span multiple layers of the TAA, so reuse isn't just about the definition layer or design. Pretty sure that's what the syllabus says, but open to other takes.
B tbh
A tbh, B is tempting but reuse isn't just about good design upfront-ISTQB wants artefacts covering multiple TAA layers.
If "reuse" meant future adaptability, B could make sense, but ISTQB usually means artefacts span layers so why not D?
A , but man these ISTQB questions love splitting hairs about TAA layers. Only A really covers that artefacts for reuse can be from several TAA levels, pretty sure that's what the syllabus points at. Disagree?
A , practice questions and ISTQB manuals always mention artefacts can span different TAA layers. B sounds off since reuse isn't just about design phase. Recommend checking the official syllabus if unsure, but I'm confident with A.
Be respectful. No spam.