1. Iden, J., & Langeland, L. (2010). Setting the Stage for a Successful ITIL Adoption. Information Systems Management, 27(2), 154-162. In the section "The Core ITIL Processes," the paper describes the flow where Incident Management addresses immediate symptoms, while Problem Management seeks the underlying cause, which often results in a Request for Change (RFC) that is then handled by Change and Release Management. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580531003708378)
2. University of Washington, UW-IT. (n.d.). ITIL Processes. Retrieved from https://itconnect.uw.edu/work/itil-processes/. The documentation outlines that "An incident may result in a problem record being created... A problem may result in a Request for Change (RFC) being submitted." This establishes the sequence of Incident -> Problem -> Change. Release Management is the mechanism for deploying that change.
3. Pollard, C., & Cater-Steel, A. (2009). Justifications, Strategies, and Critical Success Factors for ITIL Implementation in a Public Sector Enterprise: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the 13th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2009) (Paper 100). The case study analysis illustrates the process dependencies, noting that Problem Management provides input to Change Management in the form of RFCs for permanent fixes, which are then deployed. (Available via AIS Electronic Library: https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2009/100)