Q: 9
Which of the following is MOST appropriate for an organization to consider when defining incident
classification and categorization levels?
Options
Discussion
D . C is tricky but I think it's a distractor-impact matters more than just the number of assets affected.
Its D since incident classification should focus on the actual impact to the business, not just asset count or threat. Impact really drives how you prioritize response. Pretty sure that's what ISACA wants here, but open to thoughts if someone disagrees.
C Quantity of impacted assets
Had something like this in a mock and impact was always the focus for incident classification schemes. D fits since severity and priority are all about how much the business is affected, not just quantity or threat.
C or D here. I was sure quantity of impacted assets (C) would be critical since more affected systems feels like it raises the level of the incident, especially for reporting. But now reading through some practice material, most emphasize impact overall (D) as the main tie-breaker. Curious what others make of C being less important.
Option D, Pretty sure you’ll see this in the official manual and some practice tests too.
D not C. Asset quantity feels like a trap since ISACA usually wants you to focus on severity and business impact when classifying incidents.
C vs D. I don't think it's C, even though asset count seems relevant. ISACA usually looks for incident impact (D) because that's what drives response priority in most frameworks. If I'm missing something about the context, let me know, but I'm pretty sure D is right here.
D saw a similar question in a practice set, it's all about incident impact here.
Probably D. Official manual and some practice tests also go with impact as the driving factor for classification.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 9 of 35