Pretty sure B is what they're looking for. Digital signatures let the recipient check if the message was altered, but don't actually stop or fix tampering. D and C both miss that point. Let me know if you see it different.
Q: 2
An email digital signature will:
Options
Discussion
Option B But is the question asking what it guarantees, or just what it helps with? If they want to know about confidentiality instead, that'd change the pick. Official guide covers this.
Tricky wording here but digital signature only lets the recipient verify integrity, so B. It doesn't actually stop or undo tampering, just detects it. Pretty sure that's what ISACA is testing for!
C vs B? I see B picked a lot but some practice exams seem to twist wording with C. Official guide is worth double-checking for this one.
B . D is the trap since digital signatures don't actually prevent changes, they just show if tampering happened.
B tbh. Digital signature doesn't actually prevent or fix unauthorized changes, just lets you verify if the content was altered. D is tempting but a common trap here.
Likely D. Digital signature should help prevent unauthorized modification since tampering would be detected, right?
C/D? Digital signature only detects if something changed, it doesn't block or fix modifications so it's gotta be B.
B . D is tempting but digital signatures don't prevent changes, just verify if something got altered.
I don’t think it’s C. B is right since digital signatures only verify that the email hasn’t been altered, they don’t fix any unauthorized edits. Think some might confuse this with prevention or correction.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 2 of 35