Q: 7
A review of an organization’s IT portfolio revealed several applications that are not in use.
The BEST way to prevent this situation from recurring would be to implement.
Options
Discussion
D . Asset life cycle management isn't just about what gets bought, it's about reviewing, maintaining, and retiring applications too. That covers unused apps hanging around. Pretty sure that's what the question targets.
I don’t think it’s D. I picked B since business case development should stop people from buying stuff they don’t really need in the first place. Seems like if you have that up front, you avoid shelfware entirely. Maybe I’m missing how ongoing life cycle steps would catch it later, but B seems closer to root cause for me. Agree?
D imo. Had something like this in a mock exam and asset life cycle management was the expected pick for unused apps.
C vs D here-if it's about ongoing review and retiring unused apps, D (Asset life cycle management) is probably the way to go since it covers the whole process. C only handles what gets acquired, not after. Pretty sure D is best but I see why folks get stuck.
I think D, not C. Asset life cycle management covers retirement, not just acquisition. C is a common trap here.
Sick of how ISACA always makes these sound trickier than they are. D imo.
Why not C for acquisition policy if the main concern is just preventing excess apps upfront, not managing them through retirement?
D tbh, asset life cycle management handles removal and review so unused apps don't keep piling up.
B Saw a similar question on a mock exam and picked business case development for this kind of issue.
C vs D here. I went with C because having an acquisition policy should filter out unnecessary apps upfront, right? But now I'm wondering if that's enough for ongoing management. Maybe I'm missing something, but a clear approval process feels pretty key. Anyone disagree?
Be respectful. No spam.
