Option C makes sense. If IT strategy is only following trends and not aligning with actual business objectives, that's a huge risk. The point is to support the organization's needs, not just chase what’s new in the market. Pretty sure that's the biggest red flag here. Agree?
Q: 5
Which of the following would be of GREATEST concern to an IS auditor reviewing an IT
strategy document?
Options
Discussion
Option C
It's gotta be C here. If IT goals only come from market trends, that's a big red flag since there's no guarantee they're helping with what the business actually needs. That misalignment is what IS auditors worry about most, I think. Anyone disagree?
C is the real issue since IT strategy needs to fit business goals, not just follow trends. If strategic direction comes only from the market, you risk major misalignment. Pretty confident in C but open if anyone sees it differently.
I don't think B is as critical as some think-strategic alignment is a bigger deal. C looks right here, since just chasing market trends without mapping to business objectives is a classic trap for auditors. C.
Honestly, I'd say B here. Not hitting last year's IT strategic goals signals ongoing issues that might impact future strategies. I know C is risky too, but missing objectives feels like a big red flag to me. Anyone else see it that way?
Maybe C. If the IT goals only track market trends, they're probably missing what the business actually needs. Misalignment with business strategy tends to be a big deal for IS auditors. Not totally sure, but that's my take.
B for me
Its C. Saw a similar question on my mock and C was flagged as biggest concern.
C , that's the biggest audit concern. An IT strategy just chasing market trends usually means no real tie-in to business objectives, which is a classic misalignment. From what I've seen, that's always called out on CISA practice reviews.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 5 of 35