Q: 13
According to the federal court ruling in the Eastman Case, video cameras in the workplace are considered to be collecting personal information?
Options
Discussion
A
A
Probably A. Recording itself is the collection under privacy law, not just when it's viewed or stored. Pretty sure that's what Eastman clarified.
Yeah, pretty sure it's A.
A or C? If the data wasn't actually recorded (just live transmission), collection might not apply, but as soon as a recording is made it's considered collection per Eastman. Pretty sure A wins unless there's a storage nuance I'm missing, anybody see it another way?
Option A matches what the court said in Eastman. Collection starts at the moment the recording is made, not just when cameras are on or data is saved. I recall this from the official text and CIPP-C exam prep. Pretty sure about this, but correct me if I missed anything.
A not B. Collection starts when the recording happens according to Eastman, not just because the camera is on.
A imo. As soon as that recording starts, it's considered collection under the Eastman decision. If it only counted once saved, C would make sense, but I think the key detail flips it to A.
Its A, had something similar in a mock and the answer was that collection starts as soon as the recording happens, not when it's stored or watched. Pretty sure that's what the Eastman case confirmed. Agree?
A tbh
Be respectful. No spam.
