Q: 11
Which of the following existing frameworks is least effective in addressing emerging AI issues while
specific AI legislation is being decided?
Options
Discussion
Option B
B imo, because the Motor Vehicle Safety Act mostly deals with cars and not broader AI scenarios. It just doesn't cover the range of issues the others might. If someone disagrees, curious what I'm missing.
B for this one. Motor Vehicle Safety Act mainly covers physical vehicle safety, not AI in general. The others have at least some broader overlap with data or content related to AI. Pretty sure that's why B is least effective, but let me know if I missed something.
Its B here. The Motor Vehicle Safety Act is really just about automotive safety so AI issues outside of vehicles aren't covered at all. The Copyright Act and Criminal Code could both potentially address aspects like AI-generated content or misuse, so they at least have some overlap. Not 100% but pretty sure B is the least effective for general AI concerns.
I don't think it's D. Honestly, B (Motor Vehicle Safety Act) is super narrow since it only applies to cars, so for emerging AI issues in general it's the least relevant. The others (A, C, D) at least have angles that could hit AI cases through privacy, IP or criminal risks. Unless I'm missing something, B fits best here but open to debate.
Motor Vehicle Safety Act (B) only really targets issues with cars, not the wider range of AI problems. The others at least touch on broader privacy, criminal or IP risks that could overlap with AI. Pretty sure B is the weakest fit here, anyone see it differently?
Likely D, since Criminal Code doesn't really get into tech specifics like AI risks. B can cover automated vehicles at least.
I thought D makes more sense since the Criminal Code isn't AI-focused at all.
B , Motor Vehicle Safety Act is really niche compared to the others. Saw similar in a practice set-official guide covers this kind of framework stuff well if you want more.
Be respectful. No spam.
