Q: 8
Which of the following is NOT typically a function of a Privacy Officer?
Options
Discussion
Makes sense to pick A. Privacy Officers focus on policies and compliance, not running the actual tech side of info security. Pretty sure that's outside their usual scope, but open if someone has a counter example.
Wouldn't A be the odd one out? Privacy Officer rarely manages info security infra, that's more for IT or the CISO.
Don’t think B or D fit. A is the usual exception here since managing information security infrastructure is more a CISO or IT lead thing, not Privacy Officer. Some confusion if it’s super small orgs, but typically, Privacy stays on governance/compliance side. Anyone disagree?
A makes sense here. Managing security infrastructure is more of a CISO or IT thing, not usually in a Privacy Officer's wheelhouse. The other options all align better with privacy tasks, I think, but happy to hear arguments otherwise.
I get why most are picking A, since Privacy Officers aren't running security infrastructure. Still, not 100 percent sure-sometimes roles blend.
Its A. Privacy Officers normally don’t run info security infrastructure, that’s IT or CISO territory. The rest fit privacy roles.
Nah, not D. Managing security infra isn't for Privacy Officers in most orgs. A.
A , Privacy Officers don't manage info security infra. D is a trap for smaller orgs.
Don’t think A. D is more likely since Privacy Officers often handle data access requests, at least in some frameworks.
I don’t think it’s D. A is the one that stands out since Privacy Officers focus on policy and compliance, not managing info security infrastructure which is more IT/CISO territory. Pretty sure that’s what’s tested here, unless the org is super small.
Be respectful. No spam.
