Q: 4
Which of the following best demonstrates the effectiveness of a firm’s privacy incident response
process?
Options
Discussion
A is wrong, D. Decreasing mean time to resolve (MTTR) shows your team handles incidents faster, which is the real measure of response process effectiveness. B seems tempting, but that's more about prevention than response. Pretty sure D’s what's tested most.
D imo, saw something super close in my last practice set. MTTR reduction is usually the go-to metric for response efficiency.
D is the one I’d pick since mean time to resolve directly measures how quick and effective your response process is. The others are more side effects, not true indicators of response quality. Pretty sure D’s what they want here, disagree?
D , but that's only true if we're talking about the actual response process, not prevention. If the metric was about stopping incidents from happening, B could make more sense. Seen similar wordings trip people up.
D , every official study guide I checked links MTTR to measuring incident response success. Give the practice exams a look too.
D no question.
D tbh, official guide leans on MTTR for this kind of question, check practice sets if unsure.
D
D , since MTTR (mean time to resolve) directly shows how efficiently the response team handles privacy incidents once detected. A quick resolution limits damage, which is what you want in a strong incident response. Pretty sure that's what exam books aim for here. Disagree?
B . Trap is D since everyone talks about MTTR, but fewer notifiable breaches should mean better prevention or response.
Be respectful. No spam.