1. Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting (10th ed.). Cengage.
For B (Short-termism): On p. 528, it is noted that a major criticism of both ROI and RI is that "they encourage managers to take a short-term view and concentrate on short-term performance at the expense of long-term profitability."
For C (Transfer Pricing): Chapter 18, Section 18.2 (p. 546), explains how transfer prices directly impact the reported profits of the divisions involved in a transaction, which is the primary cause for disputes when divisional profit (a component of RI) is used for performance evaluation.
2. Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (1998). Advanced Management Accounting (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
For D & E (Incorrect Logic): The formula for residual income is presented as RI = Income - (Cost of Capital × Capital Invested) (p. 579). This formulation demonstrates that an increase in the 'Capital Invested' base, either through asset revaluation (D) or new capital expenditure (E), will, all else being equal, decrease the calculated RI, thus acting as a disincentive for such actions.
3. Eiteman, D. K., Stonehill, A. I., & Moffett, M. H. (2016). Multinational Business Finance (14th ed.). Pearson Education.
For A (Hedging Translation Risk): Chapter 10, "Translation Exposure," discusses how subsidiary managers whose performance is evaluated in the parent's currency (which is necessary for calculating RI for the group) may be motivated to hedge translation exposure. This is done to reduce the volatility of their reported results and protect their performance metrics from currency fluctuations, which may not be in the best economic interest of the consolidated group.