Q: 15
Grant, a fraud examiner is investigating Beatrice for embezzlement on his employer's behalf. During his investigation. Grant learns that Beatrice has cheated on her spouse and he tells several of Beatrice's coworkers about it Beatrice discovers that Grant revealed the unflattering (albeit true) information about her and decides to file a claim of defamation against Grant. Which of the following is the BEST explanation of why Beatrice will not win her defamation case?
Options
Discussion
If the statement is true, defamation doesn't stick. A.
A tbh, truth is the main defense here. Defamation only applies to false statements, so even if what Grant shared was embarrassing or mean, if it's true Beatrice has no case. B is tempting since privilege sometimes helps, but that usually covers statements made as part of a legal duty or in court. Anyone disagree?
Ugh, these "privilege" questions always get me. Going for B.
A, Truth is a full defense to defamation so as long as what Grant said was accurate, Beatrice can't win her claim.
Be respectful. No spam.