I don’t think A fits, B. TACACS+ is the only one here that actually splits authentication and authorization into independent steps, which is what the question wants. RADIUS is way more common for wireless APs, but it combines them in a single process. Pretty sure that's what they're testing for-correct me if I'm missing something.
Q: 4
Which protocol must be implemented to support separate authorization and authentication
solutions for wireless APs?
Options
Discussion
Its B here. TACACS+ actually splits up authentication and authorization, so you can manage them separately. RADIUS doesn't really do that, it mixes both steps together. Pretty sure that's what they're asking for, but open to other takes if I missed something.
B , saw a similar question in exam reports and TACACS+ is the one that actually splits authentication from authorization.
Nah, it's definitely B. RADIUS (A) is common but doesn't separate authN and authZ, that's the trap here.
Option B is right only because the question specifically calls for separate authN and authZ, not just any AAA. RADIUS bundles them (so wouldn’t meet that exact requirement), but with TACACS+ you can split them across different servers if you want. Pretty sure that’s what flips the answer, unless the APs only support RADIUS natively.
Had something like this in a mock, pretty sure it's A. RADIUS is what I always see paired with wireless APs for managing authentication and authorization. Might be missing something about splitting the processes, but A feels right to me.
A
Not A, it's B. TACACS+ is the only one listed that actually splits out authentication and authorization as separate functions, just like the question wants. RADIUS (A) is more common for wireless but lumps them together. Pretty sure this is a classic exam trick with the wording.
I don’t think it’s A. B-RADIUS is way more common but only TACACS+ actually separates authN/authZ like the question asks.
B , weird to see TACACS+ in wireless AP context on the exam but the "separate" bit matches it.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 4 of 35