Q: 5
Which type of review provides an evaluation of the Business Continuity Management System (BCMS)
outputs against the requirements or expectations to determine whether Business Continuity is
incorporated into every task undertaken through the BCMS?
Options
Discussion
C. based on most official guides and practice tests I’ve reviewed for CBCI.
C . QA is about making sure the outputs of the BCMS line up with what’s required so that business continuity gets baked into everything. External audit (D) is more about independent verification and isn’t typically continuous or internal like QA. Pretty sure C matches the "every task" part best.
Why not D here? Audit checks outputs against standards too, right?
Option C is what I'd pick too. QA focuses on embedding processes and checks throughout, so BC gets built into daily work, not just reviewed at the end. Not totally sure but I haven't seen A or D match this context.
Its D. I think audit’s the trap here but it matches the “evaluation” bit, right?
D , audit sounds tempting if you're skimming the question but I think that's the trap here.
C vs D, this type of wording trips me up every time. With BCMS reviews in practice, I've seen both QA and audits checking requirements, but QA seems more about ongoing integration. Not 100 percent but leaning C based on similar exam questions. Disagree?
D
Could be D here, since external audits also check outputs versus requirements.
D imo, since external audits check if outputs match standards. Saw a similar question in official guide stuff but not totally sure on this one, anyone else used exam practice tests for this?
Be respectful. No spam.