Q: 2
Which of the following is NOT a way in which an organization can use exercise programs to ensure
and validate supply chain continuity?
Options
Discussion
Option A is correct. Including key suppliers in an internal exercise doesn't really make sense since that would be a joint exercise, not internal. Trap is thinking D, but internal exercises can still help validate supply chain impact. Disagree?
C or A
Pretty sure it's A since you can't call an exercise "internal" if it includes key suppliers. That would turn it into a joint exercise instead. The others make sense for validating supply chain continuity with outside parties. Let me know if I missed something.
Pretty sure it's A since you can't call an exercise "internal" if it includes key suppliers. That would turn it into a joint exercise instead. The others make sense for validating supply chain continuity with outside parties. Let me know if I missed something.
D tbh
Man, wording on these CBCI questions always gets me. A imo since inviting suppliers means it isn't really an "internal" exercise. Internal should be just your own staff so pretty sure that's the right pick, unless I'm missing some subtlety.
A imo. Internal exercises shouldn't bring in external suppliers, that's a joint one. Official guide and practice tests cover these business continuity terms pretty well I think but open to correcting if I'm missing something.
Had something like this in a mock, and pretty sure it’s A. Including key suppliers means it isn’t an internal exercise anymore, which contradicts the definition. Other options fit standard supply chain validation practices.
Its D
Be respectful. No spam.