The correct answer is A because a SAR/STR narrative should be concise, clear, and complete,
addressing the who, what, when, where, why, and how of the suspicious activity. Option B is
incorrect because providing too much information can make the narrative confusing and irrelevant.
Option C is incorrect because the introduction should provide a summary of the suspicious activity,
not the conclusion. Option D is incorrect because suspect names should be mentioned in the
narrative to identify the parties involved in the suspicious activity.
Reference: Advanced CAMS-FCI Certification Handbook, page 17; Leading Complex Investigations
Certificate, Module 3.
