Q: 2
What can you achieve with the legacy data transfer in Asset Accounting via transaction AS91?
Options
Discussion
Option D is correct here. AS91 is all about posting takeover values during legacy data transfer, not setting statuses or making master data. If you look up the transaction, it's designed for that specific purpose. I think D nails it.
What if the question focused on setting up initial master data before entering values-would C take priority then?
D AS91 is used to post take over values during legacy data transfer.
D makes the most sense. AS91 is used to input the takeover values from old systems into Asset Accounting, not just asset master records. I think that's the key focus for "legacy data transfer" here, but open to other views if I'm missing something.
For me, D here. AS91 is mainly about posting the takeover values for assets from the legacy system.
C , since AS91 does start with creating the asset master record during the legacy transfer. I know D is tempting because of the values part, but I remember having to create the master data first in my practice. Maybe I missed something though.
Had something like this in a mock before-definitely D.
Yeah, D is right. AS91 is used for posting takeover values during asset legacy transfers, not for just setting up the master data (that's a separate step). Pretty sure that's what they're asking here, but let me know if you see it differently.
Not C, that one trips people up a lot on this topic. D is what AS91 handles for legacy data.
Its D, AS91 lets you enter take over values like acquisition and depreciation from your old system into the new one. It doesn’t handle creating asset master data or setting company code status. Pretty sure, but let me know if you see it differently.
Be respectful. No spam.
