Q: 6
You want to use split valuation for your refurbishing process to differentiate between materials
based on the condition of the material. What do you need to consider for the accounting data of your
material?
Options
Discussion
D fits best. With split valuation, SAP only lets you pick moving average price at the valuation area header if you want the values to update per refurb status. Pretty sure that's a technical restriction, correct me if I'm missing something.
Quick check: has anyone actually set standard price at valuation area header in refurb split val? In the scenarios I remember from exams, SAP only lets moving average price at that level if you want accurate value adjustment. Just want to confirm, because it sounds like C is tempting but doesn’t work technically here.
D tbh. SAP locks price control at the valuation area header for split valuation. See config docs.
I think C makes more sense in real life because each valuation type might need its own price control setting, not just the main valuation area. In split valuation cases I’ve worked with, we set standard price for each valuation type based on the condition. Maybe I’m missing something SAP-specific here, but C seems right to me. Let me know if I've got that wrong.
C or D, but pretty sure it's D here. For split valuation in refurb, SAP expects the valuation area (header) to be set to moving average price so value changes reflect properly as you revalue stock condition. C sounds good but it's actually a trap-price control at the valuation type isn't allowed unless header matches. Anyone disagree?
Option C Nice, clear scenario about split valuation here, seen similar in practice questions.
Be respectful. No spam.