Yeah, A makes sense here. In composite associations, the destination has to use "From Parent" for effective dating so records sync up correctly. Pretty sure that's a hard rule in SAP config-correct me if I'm off.
Q: 11
How does the system validate the destination object for composite associations?
Options
Discussion
Its A, composite needs 'From Parent' to link the timing. Not 100 percent though.
I don’t think it’s A. B.
Maybe A, . Composite associations always need 'From Parent' so B is kind of a trap.
C/D? Practice exams and the SAP docs both highlight composite association behavior, not always obvious in live config, check there if unsure.
Option D seems possible since having effective dating set to None could let the system control the timing from the parent, but I'm not totally sure. Composite associations are tricky on what they enforce. If anyone's seen this come up in config, let me know if D worked!
A imo, B is tempting but only 'From Parent' works for composite associations. SAP config checks that specifically.
B tbh. Saw similar questions in the official guide and practice tests, so maybe worth double-checking there.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 12
What must be done to ensure that you can use a custom generic (MDF) object for Employee Self-
Service? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
Options
Discussion
C/D? Had something like this in a mock, C and D both matched ESS config steps.
D , C and D are needed for ESS objects specifically. Pretty sure that's what SAP expects here.
C/D? Official SAP guide and practice tests say config UI plus externalCode as User is the combo for ESS.
A and C for me. I always thought config UI is required for ESS so users see the object, and setting externalName to User feels like it points the record to an employee for self-service. Not totally sure if it's really supposed to be externalCode instead though. Anyone else pick A?
C vs D. Some say A looks right since externalName seems user-related, but it's actually the externalCode that needs Data Type = User to link ESS records to the employee. Config UI (C) is definitely required so users can interact with the object. Pretty sure A is a common distractor here. If anyone's implemented this differently, let me know.
Maybe A and C. I remember externalName with Data Type User being required, not sure if D is a trap.
C and D imo. For Employee Self-Service, you need to link the object directly to the user so externalCode as User (D) is a must. The Config UI (C) gives users an interface to manage the object. A trips people up because externalName isn't used for this linkage in ESS cases. Correct me if I've missed something.
I don’t think it’s A. C and D.
Saw a very similar question in recent exam reports, it's C and D.
C/D? I get why people pick A, but for Employee Self-Service the system needs to know which record belongs to each employee, so externalCode as User (D) is essential. Configuration UI (C) is what lets employees access and edit those records. Pretty sure B is a distractor-Valid When association isn't mandatory for ESS here. Anyone disagree?
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 13
Which action in the THEN statement is used for propagation?
Options
Discussion
C . Set is what actually copies values from one object to another in Employee Central rules for propagation. Raise is more for messages. If anyone's seen different, let me know!
Option C nice straightforward question. Saw a similar one in a practice set, Set is always used for propagation.
Option C is the one for propagation, not D. In my experience, "Set" moves values across fields in these THEN statements. Easy to get mixed up with "Create" but that's just for new objects. If I'm off here let me know.
I don't think it's C here. D looks like it could be propagation if you're thinking about new object creation.
C, not D. "Create" looks tempting if you skim but propagation rules just need Set to move values over.
A is wrong, C. "Set" is used for propagation, not "Create" which trips some folks up on practice exams.
C , that's the one that actually copies or pushes values across fields for propagation in Employee Central. The Set action is used to auto-fill data from one object to another. D (Create) is for new records, not updating fields with propagated data. Anyone think otherwise?
C , Set is used for propagation, not Raise. Saw this as a common trap on some practice sets.
Makes sense to me-it’s C. "Set" is the action that actually pushes values into fields for propagation, not "Create."
C/D? Saw similar on a practice test and the official guide. Both mention "Set" for propagation, but I could see why someone would pick D if they're thinking about object creation.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 14
In which entities is Alert Notification supported? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
Options
Discussion
A and C tbh, had something like this in a mock and pretty sure Address Info was listed for Alert Notification.
I always thought D would be supported too, so I'd go with C and D. Personal Information changes seem alert-worthy, right? Maybe this depends on system setup though. I could be mixing up with notifications configs.
Address Info (A) and Personal Info (D) usually aren't supported for Alert Notification, at least not out-of-the-box. Had something like this in a mock exam and B & C were correct there too. Job Info and Pay Component Recurring are the main EC entities for workflow-triggered alerts. Unless they've updated something super recently?
Option D for me here, since Personal Information feels like it should support alert notifications the same way as Job Info, especially when key personal data changes. Maybe I'm mixing up which objects actually trigger alerts, but A looks more like a trap. Open to other thoughts if I missed something.
A is wrong, B and C are correct. Alert notifications hit Job Info and Pay Component Recurring, not Address or Personal Info.
Pretty sure it's B and C. Those two are always where alert notifications get triggered in Employee Central. If someone has seen different behavior recently let me know, but this matches my last config build.
Yeah, it should be B and C. Alert Notifications are set up on Job Information and Pay Component Recurring, not Address or Personal. I remember seeing this in SuccessFactors config docs too. Anyone see a reason it wouldn’t be those?
B and C, had something like this in a mock exam-those are the entities that actually support alerts.
B tbh, but C is only valid if alerts are set up against Recurring not Non-Recurring components.
Pretty sure B and C. D feels like a trap since Personal Info changes aren't standard for Alert Notifications by default in EC. If I'm off, let me know since I could be missing a config detail.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 15
Manager A initiated a job code change for Employee X with an effectivity date of January 15. Another
manager initiated the same request, but for January 30. What happens to the workflows triggered by
both transactions?
Options
Discussion
D. If the question asked about same effective dates, would that change the workflow outcome here?
Not convinced by B since both requests have different effective dates. D makes sense because SAP treats each as a separate event, so both workflows run independently. Only if they were for the same date would one get cancelled or rejected, I think. Let me know if you see it differently.
Official SAP guides and practice exams both say D.
B , pretty sure the second workflow just gets canceled if there's already one pending for the same kind of change. I thought SAP doesn't allow overlapping workflows for similar changes, even if dates are close. Correct me if I'm missing something!
D , SAP lets both workflows go since the effective dates differ here. Only cancels if dates match exactly.
I don’t think it’s B. D, since SAP keeps both workflows separate when the effective dates differ.
Pretty sure it's D here. Since the transactions have different effective dates, SAP treats each as a separate event so both workflows can run independently. Only if the dates matched would one get cancelled. If anyone disagrees let me know.
D imo, similar question came up on a practice test and both workflows stayed active since the effective dates didn't overlap.
Why not B? Wouldn't the second workflow get canceled if it's a duplicate change, even if the dates are close?
D both keep going since effectivity dates are different. I think B is a trap for same-date requests.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 11 of 20 · Page 2 / 2